Technology Innovation Projects awarded funding – Fall 2006

1) To Owen Williams to replace the general use desktop computers in the Library.  Approved for $20,720.

2) To Nancy Capistran to purchase Spectrophotometer and Gel Electro. analysis unit.  Approved for $3,099.

3) To Peg Sherven to purchase digital cameras and camcorders for student use.  Approved for $5,400.

4) To Rehett Johnson to purchase Proscope HR Lab.  Approved for $899.

5) To Mike Vivion to purchase an Advanced Telemetry Systems radio telemetry receiver.  Approved for $2,660.

6) To Mark Keränen to purchase software interface for a combination gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer instrument.  Approved for $8,245.

7) To Laura Bell to purchase equipment to implement modern technology of micro-propagation (tissue culture).  Approved for $908.95.

8) To Pamela Elf and Ken Johnson who both submitted proposals for interactive student response systems.  Committee recommendation is they form a committee to explore and recommend the best solution for UMC.  Approved funding for up to $17,000.

TOTAL AMOUNT AWARDED = $58,931.95

PROJECT #1

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:53 AM
To: 'willi099@umn.edu'
Cc: Hodgson, Jana M.; Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Owen) APPROVED!

Owen,

Congratulations we have approved your proposal for the requested amount of $20720.  Please work with the Business Office (Jana) regarding how to obtain a PO for your project.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: willi099@umn.edu [mailto:willi099@umn.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:23 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/13/2006 @ 3:22:53 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.180.25
Submitted Information
Name	Owen Williams
Email	willi099@umn.edu
CampusAddress	UMC Library
Phone	218-281-8395
Stakeholders
ProjectScope	Four years ago when Dell won the bid for laptops on the UMC Campus they gratiously placed a number of desktop computers in the library. The timing of this gift worked out very well because the library technology room was built at the same time and equipment was needed. The life-cycle of those computers are now coming to an end and will need to be replaced very shortly. In addition, selected software that is not included in the standard lap top load will be purchased. Examples of this software include photo-editing, audio-editing, and a HTML editor.
Audience	These computers and software will be available to all full and part time students. The UMC Library is open extended hours allowing better accessibility for students.
Description	The computers will be purchased with a lifespan of 4 to 5 years in mind. Staff from the Library and Help Desk will continue to maintain and support the computers and software.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	These computers will be used by students who do not have a laptop or did not bring their laptop on a particular day. There are also less loaner laptop computers available from the Helpdesk for checkout. Students will be able to use software that is not available to them from any other location on campus. Instructors will be able to load software to the computers (for which they don't have a multi-license agreement) but want their classes to have access.
ItemizedBudget	Total $20,720 12 - Dell computers OptiPlex GX620 MT with Int Broadcom® GbNIC Intel® Pentium® D Processor 820 (2.8GHz,DC,2X1M,800MHz FSB) $14,220.72 ___________________________________________________________ 1 - iMac, 20-inch, Intel Core 2 Duo Remove $1500 2.16GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 250GB Serial ATA Drive SuperDrive 8X (DVD+R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) Apple Keyboard & Mighty Mouse + Mac OS X (US English) ATI Radeon X1600/128MB VRAM 2GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM - 2x1GB Examples of Software that may be purchased: Adobe Illustrator Adobe InDesign Adobe Photoshop Fireworks MX 2004 FreeHand MX Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Pro CD Copier Easy CD Creator Adobe GoLive Dreamweaver MX 2004 Flash MX 2004 Microsoft Project Aperture iLife iWork ______________________ Software total $5000
ProjectAssessment	UMC faculty, staff, and students will be consulted when selecting items for this project.

PROJECT #2

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:53 AM
To: Capistran, Nancy
Cc: Hodgson, Jana M.; Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Nancy Capistran) APPROVED!

Nancy,

Congratulations we have approved your proposal for the requested amount of $3099.  Please work with the Business Office (Jana) regarding how to obtain a PO for your project.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: ncapistr@umcrookston.edu [mailto:ncapistr@umcrookston.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:28 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/19/2006 @ 12:27:31 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.188.40
Submitted Information
Name	Nancy Capistran
Email	ncapistr@umcrookston.edu
CampusAddress	304 Dowell Hall
Phone	218-281-8264
Stakeholders	MST faculty,some CIHS teachers, Ardell Knudsvig, coordinator of high school outreach
ProjectScope	Because of the first round of funding in this grant, we were able to not only purchase new items, but provide instructions to our MST faculty and some CIHS teachers by hosting a seminar on using this equipment. The seminar taught us new applications we can use and showcased a couple of new items that would really update equipment that we currently use. Item 1 - Spectrophotometer. With current equipment, students manually set the wavelength and get a digital read out. To run a complete spectrum takes at least 20 min/student. This new unit that interfaces with the computer, automatically runs a complete spectrum in about 2 seconds. Item 2 - Gel Electrophoresis analysis system. Currently genetics students run gels, wrap them in plastic, have the instructor go to her research lab, unwrap and photograph them with a digital camera, and then email the results to each student. This item will allow each student to plug in his/her computer, place their gel on the analyzer, and have the picture immediately. The software also allows automatic measurement and estimation of base pairs, where currently this is done with a ruler and a calculator. Items 3 & 4 - Texas Instruments calculator and linking cable. These new calculators can serve as a data storage item and with the linking cable allow probes t hat we currently have to plug into the calculators. By using the calculators for data collection rather than the laptops, this will lower the risk of the students dropping their computers in a lake or stream when used to do water quality testing in limnology, chemistry, or many of the CIHS classes. Item 5 - GPS usit that coordinates with the data collection software. It will be useful for biology field trips, and limnology marking of water testing sites. The new unit, not only collects locations, but also physical characteristics such as barometric pressure, light intensity, temperature, etc. These items will update a lot of equipment currently used to state of the art technology. Also, we have a new course coming on line, "Techniques in molecular biology" for which we can use the gel analysis system.
Audience	Students in general biology(285/yr), botany(70/yr),anatomy & physiology(48/yr),plant phy siology(30/yr),genetics(35/yr),chemistry (both organic and inorganic)(150/yr),CIHS biology classes(opento all but in the past about 50 have come), and students in high school outreach sessions(250/yr). Numbers will grow when biology degree gets approved.
Description	Vernier Software and Technology has a good reputation for building quality instruments. We have had very little trouble with items in the past. I don't anticipate much upkeep on these items. Any needed, will be supported by the science budget. We currently have the software necessary to run these items and Vernier provides free upgrades for additional software files. I will serve as the person who schedules use of the items between classes that wish to use them, and will do the instructing in the use and care to those who check the items out.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	As discussed in project scope, these items will greatly up date equipment used in teaching. It will save time in mechanical operation and data collection, allowing students to learn more about interpretation of the data collected. It will help students be current with some new technology as they join the workforce or attend graduate school.
ItemizedBudget	1 - Spectrophotometer unit $1199 1 - Gel Electro. analysis unit 799 4 - Texas Inst TI84+ $129@ 516 4 - Linking cables $59@ 236 1 - GPS unit 349 Total 3099
ProjectAssessment	Assessment will be carried out through lab reports, research papers, research projects, and other lab activities on a weekly basis. This equipment along with the data collection software will generate graphs, tables, and pictures that can all become part of these written reports that are requited of the students. It can also become part of posters, papers, etc required of UROP students, which is becoming increasingly popular with students in MST.

PROJECT #3

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:53 AM
To: 'psherven@umn.edu'
Cc: Hodgson, Jana M.; Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Peg) APPROVED!

Peg,

Congratulations we have approved your proposal for the requested amount of $5400.  Please work with the Business Office (Jana) regarding how to obtain a PO for your project.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: psherven@umn.edu [mailto:psherven@umn.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 5:12 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/19/2006 @ 5:12:05 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.180.19
Submitted Information
Name	Peg Sherven
Email	psherven@umn.edu
CampusAddress	131 Kiehle Bldg
Phone	281-8376
Stakeholders	NETS, Library, Retention committee, culture & tradition subcommittee
ProjectScope	Provide digital cameras, camcorders, and related equipment for student/faculty/staff use for two primary campus purposes: classroom-related projects and a new retention program, "First Year Photo Project", which was promoted at Focusing on the First Year (UM Retention conference). See http://www.ofyp.umn.edu/fystudents/photoproject/.
Audience	All UMC students, as well as faculty/staff for work-related purposes.
Description	Photo Project description (taken from website): The "Picture Your First Year" photo project is an opportunity for a small group of first-year students to document their personal transitions to the University through guided photography and journaling projects that reflect their own personal identity, their future hopes and dreams, their uncertainties, and what the U of M means to them. The UMC culture & tradition committee wishes to launch an online gallery to highlight photographs from these students. We will model UMC's program after the UM initiative, where selected students documented their personal transitions to the University through guided photography and journaling projects that reflected their own personal identity, their future hopes and dreams, their uncertainties, and what the U of M meant to them. Over the course of the project, the students collectively took over 500 photographs that told their stories. During the winter break, students put together a final art piece that was a final expression of what their first semester was about. These photographs were exhibited during the spring semester in the Coffman Union Gallery, in collaboration with the Visual Arts Committee of MPAC. UMC's culture & tradition committee would guide this process and develop the details of UMC's program. Cameras and related equipment would be checked out and maintained from library and help desk. Videocameras will be checked out and maintained through the NETS office. All materials will be barcoded and entered into ServiceOne &/or library database for tracking purposes. Lifecycle replacement: recommend to replace within three years, depending on wear and tear. Instruction sheets will be created by help desk and NETS office.
IntendedBenefitToStudentsSince there are few working digital cameras available for student use, the impact would be large. Not only would this benefit students for classwork, but websites could be promoted again as well. Instructors could assign more creative assignments with the use of digital photography &/or video. Videocasts/podcasts would now be possible and stored on various locations, such as help desk webpage. Culture would improve with more available assets to promote technology for our campus. New traditions will be formed with the resulting photo montage, online journal and future yearbook. Results of the photo project(s) will allow numerous marketing activities and also alleviate burden for our photographers on campus.
ItemizedBudget	Estimate: $300 x 10 digital cameras = $3000 $400 x 4 camcorders = $1600 $200 x 4 misc (tripod/microphone/headphones for camcorders) = $800 $5400 total estimated cost Note: pricing estimated with help of NETS office
ProjectAssessment	Based on checkout rate (library and help desk usage statistics), we can compare usage rates between semesters and years. Expected usage should increase, once faculty know that the cameras are available, so that their creative use can be worked into class projects. Culture and tradition committee anticipates creating an online journal which would have potential to develop into an online yearbook. Photographs may be selected to enlarge and use as promotional materials for the campus, or to create a "freshman experience" collage.

PROJECT #4

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:53 AM
To: 'john5715@umn.edu'
Cc: Hodgson, Jana M.; Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Rehett Johnson) APPROVED!

Rhett,

Congratulations we have approved your proposal for the requested amount of $899.  Please work with the Business Office (Jana) regarding how to obtain a PO for your project.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: john5715@umn.edu [mailto:john5715@umn.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:41 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/20/2006 @ 3:40:44 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.174.74
Submitted Information
Name	Rhett A. Johnson
Email	john5715@umn.edu
CampusAddress	256 Owen Hall
Phone	218-281-8141
Stakeholders	Sue Jacobson
ProjectScope	We would like to purchase a microscope video system to enable the capture of microscope images and the projection of images in the classroom.
Audience	UMC Natural Resources students; Plant Taxonomy and Horticulture instructors
Description	The equipment will be used in the Plant Taxonomy class and in the Horticulture classes. It will be stored in a lo cked cabinet in Owen Hall.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	It will make it possible to show fine features of organisms that the students can have trouble finding in their own specimens. It will also allow students to download images to their own computers to assist their learning. It will be especially useful to the students when they are studying plant families.
ItemizedBudget	Proscope HR Lab $899.00 This includes a USB digital camera, 3 magnification lenses, a free-standing mount, and an adaptor for microscopes. available at: Bodelin Technologies 6077A Lakeview Blvd. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 1-800-441-6877
ProjectAssessment

PROJECT #5

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:53 AM
To: 'mvivion@umn.edu'
Cc: Hodgson, Jana M.; Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Mike Vivion) APPROVED!

Mike,

Congratulations we have approved your proposal for the requested amount of $2660.  Please work with the Business Office (Jana) regarding how to obtain a PO for your project.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: mvivion@umn.edu [mailto:mvivion@umn.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:53 AM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/17/2006 @ 10:52:53 AM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.174.5
Submitted Information
Name	Michael T. Vivion
Email	mvivion@umn.edu
CampusAddress	109 Hill Hall
Phone	218 281 8114
Stakeholders	Dr. John Loegering, Dr. Dan Svedarsky
ProjectScope	Purchase an Advanced Telemetry Systems radio telemetry receiver. This receiver is a widely used unit in wildlife and fisheries research and investigations work. The unit would permit students to electronically locate and track radio tagged animals in the vicinity, from the air and on the ground. Radio telemetry skills are an important skill set, generally developed on the job, for wildlife and fisheries professionals. The equipment would be utilized in our Advanced Tailwheel (AVIA 3396) course, in AVIA 3602, Natural Resource and Law Enforcement Aviation Applications, and in other NatR courses that include a radio telemetry component. This equipment could also permit UMC to provide radio location data to researchers in the area, while providing students invaluable experience and training.
Audience	Natural Resource and Law Enforcement Aviation students primarily, as well as other Natural Resource students
Description	These receivers are quite durable. In the 20 plus years I used this model of receiver in my previous employ, we had one unit require servicing, and the cost was less than $100. The technology that these receivers utilize is fairly mature. I envision that this receiver should last for many years into the future with utilization by students. Our Top Cub aircraft (N577CC) has already been equipped with wiring and switches to facilitate utilization of this type of receiver. This work was completed cooperatively between UND Aerospace Foundation and UMC's Natural Resources Department, with funding and in-kind support from both sources. Future support and maintenance of equipment installed in the aircraft will be provided by UNDAF under their routine aircraft maintenance schedules.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	Using a telemetry receiver to locate instrumented animals in the Crookston area (there are approximately 50 instrumented Prairie Chickens nearby at the moment, for example) will offer our students a chance to develop good basic skills in this important and widely used procedure. Primarily, this receiver will be used in antenna equipped UMC aircraft to provide our aviation students the opportunity to develop the basic flight and electronic skills needed to saf ely conduct aerial radio telemetry operations. The receiver, when not in use by Aviation students, will also be available to other Natural Resource staff for use by Natural Resource students, and to provide radio locations of animals for researchers in the area, upon their request. Radio telemetry skills are very important in many fields of wildlife and fisheries management and research. These skills are often developed on the job, which imposes substantial expense upon the employer, and introduces inefficiencies in field projects while employees are brought up to adequate skill levels. With this equipment, we can not only send our students into the work force already equipped with a basic knowledge of the procedures involved in radio telemetry, but also with a good introduction to aerial telemetry techniques. This equipment will facilitate accomplishment of UROP and other grant proposals by students.
ItemizedBudget	Advanced Telemetry Systems Model R4000 Challenger Radio Telemetry Receiver, frequency range 150.00-153.999 mHz Cost: $2650.00 ATS Model 12490 Sci Battery Charger No Charge Shipping and Handling Charges Cost: $10.00 Total cost: $2660
ProjectAssessment	Records will be kept of receiver utilization, both in aircraft and in surface based operations. Students in AVIA 3396 and 3602 will be required to demonstrate competence in use of this technology prior to completion of the course. Reports will be required of all students who utilize this equipment in support of UROP or other proposals. Coordinator of Aviation Programs will provide an annual summary of receiver utilization to UMC Technology Committee.

PROJECT #6

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:53 AM
To: 'keran004@umn.edu'
Cc: Hodgson, Jana M.; Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Mark Keränen) APPROVED!

Mark,

Congratulations we have approved your proposal for the requested amount of $8245.  Please work with the Business Office (Jana) regarding how to obtain a PO for your project.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: keran004@umn.edu [mailto:keran004@umn.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:06 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/19/2006 @ 12:06:10 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.188.32
Submitted Information
Name	Mark D. Keränen
Email	keran004@umn.edu
CampusAddress	150 Dowell Annex
Phone	281-8188
Stakeholders	Science faculty
ProjectScope	This proposal is requesting funding to replace the software interface for a combination gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer instrument used by researching science faculty and students of selected chemistry and biology courses. The major limitation to the platform currently existing is the software system that this type of otherwise sophisticated instrumentation frequently requires. The traditional setup consist s of the GC/MS interfaced to a computer where spectra (acquired data for a particular compound or experiment) will be displayed. Many instruments such as ours support software that runs on MS-DOS or primitive Windows 3.1 operating systems. This severely limits the ability to manipulate and export data and graphics to work with modern operating systems and graphics software when creating reports of their findings. Adron Systems (headquartered in LaPorte, MN) offers upgraded mass spectrometer data systems for a variety of instruments that offer a possibility to improve the performance and extend the life of the GC/MS instrument we have on campus. Adron's VX acquisition system takes advantage of today's powerful PCs and utilizes the Windows XP operating system; providing an intuitive and much more visually friendly user experience.
Audience	Students of chemistry and biology, researching science faculty.
Description	Once installation is performed, it is anticipated that technical issues with the software and associated hardware interfaces will be minimal. Typically issues such as column replacement and routine mechanical maintenance of the GC/MS occur more frequently than software failure. Should this be the case, however, the cost of software support visits can be kept to a minimum due to the proximity of the vendor to our campus (LaPorte is a two hour drive from Crookston). This locally-produced software is currently the most technologically advanced interface available, and can be expected to serve our science students and faculty for many years to come.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	The recently-acquired combination gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) housed in the department of Math, Science and Technology is an essential analytical tool for students in chemistry and biology at UMC. Students have an opportunity to use m odern instrumentation to obtain real-time analyses of compounds they have produced or used in a lab setting. Many students who choose to work in an analytical lab upon completion of to their studies will be using identical or similar instrumentation in their daily work.
ItemizedBudget	XV acquisition system for Finnigan Magnum GC/MS $ 4995.00 Agilent MS ChemStation software $ 1995.00 National instruments PCI-GPIB controller card $ 495.00 Varian 3400 PC serial cable $ 140.00 Quatech 2 port RS-232 PCI board with DB-9 ports $ 120.00 One day on-site installation at UMC $ 500.00 Total request $ 8245.00
ProjectAssessment	Students will be acquiring and manipulating their own data after a short training period on the instrument is completed. Given the current antiquated operating system, acquisition must be performed by an individual wit h a greater deal of training (typically the instructor), thus denying the student the opportunity to become familiar with the instrumentation and technology. In assessing the impact of the new upgrades on students' ability to understand and manipulate their own data, An initial survey will be conducted in order to establish a baseline of understanding and comfort with the current operating system. Subsequent to installation of the new interface, another survey measuring the student's knowledge of the methodology and comfort with data analysis and manipulation will be conducted. It is expected that the availability of these new software and hardware upgrades will greatly increase students' understanding of and familiarity with analytical technologies that they may be required to use on a daily basis in their careers by providing them with a modern, hands-on interface to this device.

PROJECT #7

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:53 AM
To: 'lbell@umn.edu'
Cc: Hodgson, Jana M.; Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Laura Bell) APPROVED!

Laura,

Congratulations we have approved your proposal for the requested amount of $908.95.  Please work with the Business Office (Jana) regarding how to obtain a PO for your project.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: lbell@umn.edu [mailto:lbell@umn.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:12 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/20/2006 @ 3:12:23 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.174.32
Submitted Information
Name	Laura Bell, Theresa Helgeson - Lab Services Coordinators
Email	lbell@umn.edu, helg0145@umn.edu,
CampusAddress	Natural Resources, 109 Hill
Phone	218-281-8131
Stakeholders	Phil Baird, Melinda McVey McCluskey(instructors) MaryJo Geldert(student) and future UROP students pbaird@umn.edu, mccluske@umn.edu, geld0010@umn.edu
ProjectScope	Implementing modern technology of micro-propagation (tissue culture) for student involvement, collaboration, restoration, and ongoing and future research.
Audience	Natural Resources students, faculty, and staff
Description	Support for this project will be provided by the Horticulture and Natural Resources programs. . pH meter o Maintenance: provided by Natural Resources staff - Laura Bell and Theresa Helgeson, Lab Services Coordinators o Lifecycle Replacement: Replacement parts and buffers available through catalog order yet equipment is expected to last several years. . Hot Plate Stirrer o Maintenance: provided by Natural Resources staff - Laura Bell and Theresa Helgeson, Lab Services Coordinators o Lifecycle Replacement: Equipment is expected to last several years.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	This project is an incredible opportunity to allow students the chance to be a part of something new and exciting with the use of micro-propagation (tissue culture). In previous years the plant propagation class has only had access to conventional methods of propagation techniques while micro-propagation was lectured on but never applied. With the addition of these materials the plant propagation class will have the opportunity to practice micro-propagation techniques, from allowing students to partake in preparing media to actually performing micro-propagation proficiently. In addition to class use, this project is also serving as a pilot project with the Minnesota DNR, specifically Itasca State Park. With this particular partnership between UMC and Itasca, micro-propagation will be used to propagate native plant materials for ongoing restoration efforts in the park. This type of involvement is a unique opportunity for students to not only use a new skill but to be able to apply that skill in the field. With the recent change in emphas is to Environmental Landscaping, exposure to this technology equips students with important practical skills for today's modern horticulture industry. Students graduating from UMC would have a rare skill.
ItemizedBudget	1 pH meter - $89, Fondriest Environmental Monitoring Products 2 Hot Plate Stirrers - $395 each, Carolina Biological Supply Company (The purchase of 2 will allow for the preparation of needed media simultaneously) Estimated Shipping & Handling: $29.95 Total: $908.95
ProjectAssessment	Develop a minimum of three labs for the plant propagation class utilizing micro-propagation. Micro-propagation of Cornus spp, Hepatica s., Asarum sp, Diervilla sp, Iris sp, and Dirca sp for Itasca State Park's ongoing restoration efforts. The plant list will expand once the project moves beyond the pilot stage.

PROJECT #8

From: Sperling, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:34 AM
To: pelf@umn.edu;dingm021@umn.edu; Johnson, Kenneth Lowell
Cc: Baird, Phil; Brorson, Bruce; Christopherson, Michelle; DeMuth, David; Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela; Larson, Donna S.; Medal, Don; Peterson, Bill; Sanders, Tricia; Sherven, Peg; Sinks, Jeff; Sperling, Jeff; Willhite, Gary; Williams, Owen
Subject: RE: Innovation Projects (Pam and Ken) APPROVED!

Pam and Ken,

The Technology Committee is very interested in your proposals (interactive student response systems).  We all agree this as an opportunity to enhance student learning and classroom participation.  The committee has approved funding of up-to $17,000 for this project.  We would also request that a subcommittee be established to research and evaluate a solution that best fits our academic needs at UMC.  We would recommend that both Ken and Pam lead this subcommittee effort and invite other faculty and/or staff to participate as well.  I understand Kevin Thompson shares your interest.  Once you have reached a conclusion we would like the subcommittee to present their recommendation(s) to the Technology committee for final approval.

I hope you are both agreeable to this recommendation and this is workable solution.  If you have questions or concerns please contact me or any committee member.

Thanks,

Jeff

---

From: "pelf@umn.edu/dingm021"@umn.edu [mailto:"pelf@umn.edu/dingm021"@umn.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 5:02 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/20/2006 @ 5:02:28 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.188.57
Submitted Information
Name	Pamela Elf and Brian DIngmann
Email	pelf@umn.edu/dingm021@umn.edu
CampusAddress	242 & 147 Dowell Hall Annex
Phone	218-281-8263/ 218-281-8249
Stakeholders	N. Shay, B. Boyle, B. Buchmeier, M. Keranen, K. Johnson
ProjectScope	Student engagement during lectures is one of the greatest challenges to instructors given the attention span and need for constant multiple stimuli of today's students. This project will support the purchase of two ACTIVclassroom systems with peripherals for establishing interactive classrooms in Dowell Hall. The central component of the system is the ACTIVboard with ACTIVstudio software. The ACTIVboard is a hard surface, electromagnetic whiteboard that links directly to a computer and is supplied with an ACTIVpen which performs all mouse actions, including left click, right click and the ability to roll over items shown on the screen. The ACTIVboard has a built-in radio frequency transceiver that allows the board to communicate with other wireless peripherals, the ACTIVslate XR and the ACTIVote devices - accessories that can be incorporated into the classroom to increase the level of interaction with students. ACTIVstudio is the lesson creation tool that comes complete with thousands of searchable images, backgrounds, shapes, lines, manipulatives and other resources for teaching. Interactive tools include a working ruler, protractor, calculator and fraction creator for math functions, word and shape recognition tools for converting drawing and writing into computer generated shapes an d type, a pen, eraser and highlighter with a wide choice of colors, and many more tools that make it easy to develop lessons that encourage student participation. The added beauty of this system is that anything that is created during class time can be saved directly to the computer. The ACTIVslate offers flexibility because it allows interaction with the board from anywhere within the classroom so is ideal for passing among students for their direct input onto the board which can be shared during class time and captured for later use as well. This would also be invaluable because it would allow direct access to the board for students with disabilities. The ACTIVotes are wireless handheld devices which allow students to respond to questions or opinion polls presented on the ACTIVboard. They also work via radio communication to the built-in transceiver on the ACTIVboard, there is no need to point the devices and students can answer either anonymously or by name. This affords the opportunity to do real time data driven assessment of whether or not students are gaining an understanding of the materials being presented in class. Students receive instant feedback as well and we can have an immediate discussion about why their answer was right or wrong. In the few short weeks that my students in A&PI have been exposed to the ACTIVboard system, they have all had positive comments about it, and almost look forward to quizzes as they end up being an open forum for discussing material not well understood. We believe these systems will allow us to produce better and more interesting lecture presentations which will incorporate the latest technologies for student engagement and involvement in active learning. At the same time they will become an excellent tool for assessing student learning, and with the built-in data analysis function they will make the process almost painless. Our initial plan is to obtain two boards, one to be permanently mounted in one of the smaller class rooms on third floor Dowell, the other to be on a portable stand which could be used in larger classrooms and moved when needed for use elsewhere. The permanently mounted board is the newest design and will not be shipped to us until probably January, but it includes a special built-in projector system designed specifically for the ACTIVboard system. This projector is mounted to the top of the board decreasing shadowing while working on the board. Specifications for all equipment is available from Pam Elf if desired. As our familiarity and proficiency with the system improves we plan to schedule seminars to introduce the system capabilities and teach others to use them. Hopefully the boards would be available for as many faculty to use as possible. To view the IT presentation I gave on the capabilities of the board, please go to this address: http://mediasite.umcrookston.edu//viewer/?peid=778c62d4-e649-4 001-a859-9495145cc515
Audience	All students who are enrolled in biology courses initially, and eventually all students in other courses whose instructors are interested in using the technology. Each system purchased can have the software installed on up to 6 computers, so with two systems, 12 different instructors could have direct access, and common computers could be set-up if more instructors were interested in using the technology.
Description	These systems come with a 3 year (if we do the installation) or 5 year (if they do the installation) warrantee. An extended warrantee is available and is included in the budget of this proposal. If these systems are to be used primarily by the Math, Science and Technology Department, that Department will support future maintenance and/or upkeep that must be done. If the technology is used by other departments as well, an agreement will be reached about multiple departments supporting the maintenance and upkeep. Hopefully by the time these units need to be replaced they will be replaced by the next new wave of technology.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	The ACTIVboard with its accompanying peripherals, the ACTIVslate and ACTIVotes encourage student engagement in lectures by allowing direct input from students along with quizzing and polling, which provide immediate feedback to them and their instructors as to the extent of their comprehension of lecture materials. Because of the added tools and their multiple functions options for creating a unique classroom experience are almost limitless.
ItemizedBudget	Budget reflects cost of two systems. ACTIVboard 78" USB, Bluetooth & Serial with ACTIVstudio @ $1795.00 $1795.00 ACTIVstand w/castors @ $449.00 $449.00 ACTIVboard+2 all-in-on e system (with built in projector) @ $4395.00 $4395.00 ACTIVote 32 count @ $1895.00 $3790.00 ACTIVslate XR @ $495.00 $990.00 ACTIVwand @ $79.00 $158.00 Extended warranty (est.)per year (after initial warranty)@ $250.00 $500.00 Devlivery (est.) @ $195.00 $195.00 Total cost for two systems $12272.00
ProjectAssessment	Students will be asked to evaluate the use of the ACTIVboard system at the end of the semester when they do their course evaluations. This will provide data as to whether or not they feel it has increased their participation and improved their learning experience. Since this is an assessment tool as well as a teaching tool, instructors will be able to evaluate the impact of immediate feedback during lectures by comparisons of student performance on exams from previous years or before use of the ACTIVboard.

---

From: joh02053@umn.edu [mailto:joh02053@umn.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 2:35 PM
To: Tech Committee
Subject: Innovation Projects

Submitted:	10/19/2006 @ 2:34:52 PM
Sender IP Address:	146.57.172.170
Submitted Information
Name	Kenneth L.H.O. Johnson
Email	joh02053@umn.edu
CampusAddress	DH 109
Phone	281-8178 (w); (701) 361-0164 (cell)
Stakeholders	Other Business Department faculty members are direct stakeholders. UMC in general is a stakeholder in any retention efforts, including this project.
ProjectScope	The scope of this project is potentially enormous. A quick, informal survey of Business Department faculty indicated the majority would be likely to utilize student response systems (hereafter referred to as SRS) if they were made available. Comments ranged from "I f they were available I'd likely try them out" to "I'd definitely use them a lot". One instructor pointed out that the portability of the technology is particularly important. Whether it be for the customized training provided by Manufacturing Management for firms such as Polaris, or for the instructor moving from classroom to classroom, portability is essential. So, the scope of this project increases dramatically when one considers the flexible nature of the technology. Business Activities Day will be a major recruitment effort during Spring semester 2007. The SRS will be utilized for grading of contests and other activities that day. Around 300 students are expected that day. Also, the summer start CA 1010 class in particular would be a great choice to incorporate SRS technology into the classroom. One example is the Principle of Marketing course offered on campus, which definitely would utilize the technology. Assuming a five-year product life span, three sections of Marketing a year multiplied by an average of 30 students per section has an minimum impact of benefiting 450 students. When one considers all classes which would utilize the technology coupled with all external opportunities, the potential impact quickly reaches the thousands. Dr. Casey mentioned his vision of a 12-month campus and SRS can fit well in that vision when one considers CEU and other credit and non-credit opportunities that will be available at UMC in the future.
Audience	The audiences served by this grant will be the faculty who incorporate the technology into their lectures and the students in those classes. Additionally, the system will be available for presentations faculty give outside the classroom, such as at conferences and training sessions.
Description	Once the SRS is purchased, maintenance will be a relatively minor concern. There is a lengthy replacement warranty. After the warranty expires, the vendor replaces remotes at a reduced cost of $25. If repairs are necessary, the cost can be as low as minimal shipping depending upon the work required. Bundled in this proposal are five extra remotes which can be used as replacements or whenever additional remotes may be needed. The vendor supports clients via toll-free phone and email support. This support includes hardware and software. The hardware is relatively straightforward but integration with software applications sometimes provides instructors difficulty. This vendor in particular provides phenomenal technical support on a very timely basis. It is assumed the life cycle of this product's usage at UMC will be five years. The remotes themselves likely will physically last much longer than five years but new technology will eventually make this product obsolete. Replacement will likely be with a technology not in existence today.
IntendedBenefitToStudents	Several studies have shown a positive relationship between the usage of student response systems and increased attendance, improved student engagement, and increased student willingness to take an active role in lectures. Attendance and involvement have a direct impact on student performance and retention. In one study, attendance improved from 50% in the control group to 80% which the treatment group using SRS. Other tangible benefits include but are not limited to the following: 1) Attention grabber: When students are prompted to respond to questions posed in class it refocuses them on the coursework. When an instructor sees students minds wandering he or she can quickly utilize the technology to regain their attention. 2) Anonymity: Many students are intimidated by a "show of hands" or other instructor request for an answer. SRS provide a consequence-free environment whereby stud ents can actively participate without fear. 3) Improved pace of lectures: The "show of hands" technique mentioned earlier is inherently flawed. Students feel intimidated and often wait until other hands go up to "cast their vote". Studies show students regularly alter their votes in front of peers as well. Students who do not understand may also feel embarrassed to say anything in front of their peers. The SRS provides a much more accurate assessment of student proficiency with the lecture material. If the vast majority answers correctly, the instructor is prompted to move on. If a significant percentage answer incorrectly, the instructor is prompted to clarify the material further. 4) Feedback: Instructors strive to give timely feedback. Students crave timely feedback. SRS provides instant feedback. 5) Higher test scores. A study conducted at North Carolina saw an increase in test scores. The treatment group (use of student response systems) achieved an 89.98% average compared to the control group (traditional instruction) which received an 84.41% average. 6) Positive student attitudes towards SRS: A focus group at North Carolina State University was organized to provide insight into student attitudes towards SRS. The following words were used the most by the students in describing the audience-response system: helped, easy, participate, fun, learn, pay attention and understand. Another study completed at Texas A&M found "clickers are fairly easy to use, and provide a fun way to quickly turn traditional classroom lectures into interactive learning experiences". An informal survey completed by the grant writer at UMC found an overwhelmingly positive reaction to the possibility of SRS usage on campus. 7) A step away from the laptop: Polling system currently available on campus is quite impressive. However, SRS is unique in several critical ways. First, it forces students to remove themselve s mentally from the laptop, which all too often is a distraction. Second, the SRS systems available are seamless in their integration into Microsoft® PowerPoint software. Third, questions are very easy to create "on the fly". 8) Ease of use and cost: The most common complaints students have nationwide about SRS systems are 1) they don't always work well, and 2) they cost the student money. This proposal addresses both concerns directly. First, the SRS today which would be purchased with the funding are much more reliable and easy to use than earlier models. More importantly, with the SRS which would be purchased the students would not have to buy anything; the remotes will be provided free of charge to them. 9) Learning benefits: One study published in the January 2002 issue of Physics Education, "Enhanced student learning in the introductory physics laboratory" by Ann J Cox, Eckerd College and Dr. William F Junkin III, Erskine College states that using an interactive learning methodology can provide a learning gain of between 50 - 100%. 10) Another technology: SRS is another technology that students will be exposed to which can be transferred to the workplace. This will be yet another technology they can add to their resume.
ItemizedBudget	QUANTITY ID NUMBER DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 02-050 Beyond Question Set - Lecture 50* 1,995.00 $1,995.00 2 02-030 Beyond Question Set - Standard 30**$ 1,295.00 $2,590.00 5 02-002 Additional student remote(s) 40.00 $200.00 Subtotal $4,785.00 Shipping & Handling $110.00 TOTAL $4,895.00 Comp time for training $20.00/hour $200.00 GRAND TOTAL $5,095.00 * Lecture set includes 50 student remotes, 1 instructor remote, 2 IR receivers, 2 16' cables, Software CD and 2 custom cases ** Standard set includes 30 student remotes, 1 instructor remote, IR receiver, 16' cable, Software CD and custom case
ProjectAssessment	The project will be assessed through several methods. First, there is historical data from previous classes regarding test scores, etc. This data can be compared with test scores in future semesters to assess whether there truly are increases in knowledge. Attendance can be assessed the same way. Retention can be tracked as well. Additionally, a survey can be created to assess students' opinions to SRS and administered at the end of each semester. Where two sections of the same class are taught by the same instructor, one class can use the SRS (treatment group) and one class can receive the material the traditional way (control group). It would be relatively easy to determine what gains, if any, the treatment group realized.